Dear Ms. Ramirez,
A friend directed me to your column of November 21, 2008, thinking that since I live near Davis I might find it interesting. She also pointed out Al Martinez's LA Times column of December 1, 2008.I apologize for the rude and/or threatening letters you have received. Unfortunately this is an emotionally charged issue and many people (on both sides of the issue) have poor impulse control. As a retired police officer, I would assure you and your Mother that almost without exception these fools don't act on their words.
I do have a few comments -- first, I wonder if you think that all police officers are "off [their] rockers" as they frequently carry "pocket-sized killing machines to 'lecture'" (albeit without "burning desire" -- it's just part of the job).
I'm not affiliated with SCCC in any fashion, but I know that the organization does not "argue for the arming of the mentally unstable," it merely advocates that colleges and universities not be exempt from the firearm rules that generally apply in society -- that concealed weapon license holders can legally carry a weapon as a means of protection for themselves and others.
If SCCC's goals became law, in California this would limit the legal carrying of weapons to those who have reached 21, passed a practical exam showing competence and safety in the handling of the firearm(s) they will use and have been "certified" by their local police chief or sheriff (California is a "may issue" state -- chiefs and sheriffs can deny a permit to anyone for any reason, no explanation or justification required).
Of course, this would not change the illegal carrying of weapons, just as the situation is now, anyone could illegally carry a weapon.
In closing, I would like to extend an invitation to you and one or two of your friends to visit our local shooting range for a session in firearm safety, handling and marksmanship. I will provide ammunition, several handguns and longarms and safety equipment.
Respectfully,
No comments:
Post a Comment